· Abstracts should be no longer than one A4 page in portrait layout.
· The title of the abstract should be as concise as possible and should appear in bold, sentence cased and centered.
· Co-authors and affiliations below the title should be in Italics (the main author's name should be underlined, and the name of the presenting author should be marked with an asterisk (*).
· The abstract must be written in the most preferable language, i.e. English and content should have a maximum character of 300 words.
· The main body of the abstract should be in Times New Roman, Font size 12, Justified, Line spacing 1.5.
· References, denoted by superscript numbers in the text should be listed at the end of the text using standard Chemical Abstracts Source Service Index terminology followed by YEAR, VOLUME and PAGE.
· The use of figures, graphs, and schemes are recommended where this aids the understanding of the text.
· Abstracts should be submitted as in MS Word or PDF format, either via email attachment to conference email with the subject line 'conference name abstract' or online submission method via the conference website.
· Please include the full details of the main author and the presenting author in the email and indicate whether you are submitting an Oral or a Poster Presentation.
· Note: There is a 1 MB limit for online abstract submission, if your abstract is larger than 1 MB, then you are recommended to send it via email as an attachment.
· After completion of the conference, speakers could submit their full-length papers to any of our related journals and it will be published within 2 months of the time period with additional charges.
· A confirmation mail will be sent in regards to receiving your abstract, and if the submitter does not receive any mail within next 24 Hrs, he/she is suggested to the contact the respective conference coordinator, manager or ambassador.
We firmly believe that ethical conduct is the most essential virtual of any academic, hence any act of plagiarism is totally unaccepted and academic misconduct will not be tolerated.
OPTION-1
Suited for
research conducted in all the disciplines. Check a sample abstract for this
option here. Abstracts submitted under the first option should contain concise
statements of:
·
Backgrounds: Indicate the purpose and objective of the
research, the hypothesis that was tested or a description of the problem being
analyzed or evaluated.
·
Methods: Describe (the study period/ setting/location, study
design, study population, data collection and methods of analysis used.
·
Results: Present as clearly and in as much detail as possible the
findings/outcome of the study. Please summarize any specific results.
·
Conclusions: Explain the significance of your
findings/outcomes of the study of HIV prevention, treatment, care and/or
support, and future Implications of the results.
The following review criteria will be used in
scrolling abstracts submitted under OPTION 1:
·
Is
there a clear background and Justified objective?
·
Is
the methodology/study design appropriate for the objectives?
·
Are
the results important and clearly presented?
·
Are
the conclusions supported by the results?
·
Is
the study original, and does it contribute to the field?
OPTION-2
Suited for
research conducted in all disciplines. Check a sample abstract for this option
here. Abstracts submitted under the first option should contain concise
statements of:
·
Backgrounds: Summarize the purpose, scope, and
objectives, of the programme, project or policy.
·
Methods: Describe the programme, project or policy period/
setting/location, the structure, key population (if applicable), activities and
interventions were undertaken in support
of the programme, project or policy.
·
Lessons Learned: Present as clearly and in as much detail as
possible the methods / findings / outcomes of the programme, project or policy;
Include analytic approaches, evaluation of lessons learned and best practices
with a succinct description of the methods used, in addition, please summarize
any specific results that specifically support your conclusions of lessons
learned and best practices.
·
Conclusions: Explain the significance of the methods used
and findings/outcomes of the programme, project or policy for HIV prevention,
treatment, care and /or support, and future implications of the results.
PEER-REVIEW
PROCESS:
All submitted abstracts will go through a peer review process
carried out by a peer review committee. After the successful review of your
abstract, we will guide you further steps towards your presence at our event.